A stock option is an offer by a company that gives employees the right to buy a specified number of shares in the company at an agreed upon price (usually lower than market) by a specific date. The employee is under no obligation to purchase all or part of the number of shares noted in the option.
What Is a Stock Option?
Also, would the company have to pay any taxes on the options they're giving me instead of my salary normally I believe they have to pay 7. The objection that management might have that flows out of the fact that the pool of available options is fixed in size for the current year. Or maybe several years depending on how they structured the compensation plan. Within that pool they have allocated some to various key individuals and then some to to the ESOP pool.
They don't want requests for more options than they planned to issue in that period. Suppose that many people notice that the companies prospects are good and offer to forgo some salary for options. This could easily eat up the whole pool and leave nothing for the rest of the year.
I think we have a good thing going and I would like to own more of the company and am comfortable with the risk. I would hope that the stock options given would be slightly more than the cash compensation I'm giving up. Is that how these things generally work, and what percentage is usually fair?
Benefits for the company: I believe it could be structured in a way where stock dilution would not happen until the option is exercised.
So they pay for my time now, with the dilution happening two years down the line. They'd also be able to raise money internally as opposed to outside sources. I was thinking fair terms of an offering would be: In the event of an acquisition or IPO all options under this program would vest immediately.
Valuation on which the options would be based one would be done annually or at the last funding round, whichever happened most recently. These would be qualified stock options so the strike price would match the value of the stock at the time it's granted. So, while the practice of not recording any costs for stock options began long ago, the number being handed out was so small that a lot of people ignored it.
It is at this point that using stock options as a form of compensation really starts to take off. Coinciding with this increase in options granting is a raging bull market in equities, specifically in technology-related stocks, which benefits from innovations and heightened investor demand.
Pretty soon it wasn't just top executives receiving stock options, but rank-and-file employees as well. The stock option had gone from a back-room executive favor to a full-on competitive advantage for companies wishing to attract and motivate top talent, especially young talent that didn't mind getting a few options full of chance in essence, lottery tickets instead of extra cash come payday. But thanks to the booming stock market , instead of lottery tickets, the options granted to employees were as good as gold.
This provided a key strategic advantage to smaller companies with shallower pockets, who could save their cash and simply issue more and more options, all the while not recording a penny of the transaction as an expense.
Warren Buffet postulated on the state of affairs in his letter to shareholders: It's Valuation Time Despite having a good run, the "lottery" eventually ended - and abruptly. The technology-fueled bubble in the stock market burst, and millions of options that were once profitable had become worthless, or " underwater.
What Are the Costs? The costs that stock options can pose to shareholders are a matter of much debate. According to the FASB, no specific method of valuing options grants is being forced on companies, primarily because no "best method" has been determined. Stock options granted to employees have key differences from those sold on the exchanges, such as vesting periods and lack of transferability only the employee can ever use them.
In their statement along with the resolution, the FASB will allow for any valuation method, so long as it incorporates the key variables that make up the most commonly used methods, such as Black Scholes and binomial.
The key variables are:. Corporations are allowed to use their own discretion when choosing a valuation model, but it must also be agreed upon by their auditors. Still, there can be surprisingly large differences in ending valuations depending on the method used and the assumptions in place, especially the volatility assumptions.
Because both companies and investors are entering new territory here, valuations and methods are bound to change over time.
What is known is what has already occurred, and that is that many companies have reduced, adjusted or eliminated their existing stock options programs altogether.
Faced with the prospect of having to include estimated costs at the time of granting, many firms have chosen to change fast. Consider the following statistic: The chart below highlights this trend.
The slope of the graph is exaggerated because of depressed earnings during the bear market of and , but the trend is still undeniable, not to mention dramatic. We are now seeing new models of compensation and incentive-pay to managers and other employees through restricted stock awards, operational target bonuses and other creative methods.
It's just in the beginning phases, so we can expect to see both tweaking and true innovation with time. Some industries will be more affected than others, most notably the tech industry, and Nasdaq stocks will show a higher aggregate reduction than NYSE stocks. Trends like this could cause some sector rotation toward industries where the percentage of net income "in danger" is lower, as investors sort out which businesses will be hurt the most in the short term.
It is crucial to note that since , stock options expensing has been contained in Q and K reports - they were buried in the footnotes, but they were there. Investors can look in the section usually titled "Stock-Based Compensation" or "Stock Options Plans" to find important information about the total number of options at the company's disposal to grant or the vesting periods and potential dilutive effects on shareholders.
As a review for those who might have forgotten, every option that is converted into a share by an employee dilutes the percentage of ownership of every other shareholder in the company. Many companies that issue large numbers of options also have stock repurchase programs to help offset dilution , but that means they're paying cash to buy back stock that has been given out for free to employees - these types of stock repurchases should be looked at as a compensation cost to employees, rather than an outpouring of love for the average shareholders from flush corporate coffers.
The hardest proponents of efficient market theory will say that investors needn't worry about this accounting change ; since the figures have already been in the footnotes, the argument goes, stock markets will have already incorporated this information into share prices. As with the industries above, individual stock results will be highly skewed, as can be shown in the following examples:.
They have the extra advantage of two or three years to design new compensation structures that satisfy both employees and the FASB.
Real Business Advice!
Company stock options allow employees to invest without paying broker's fees. They can offer some tax benefits. What are the cons of offering employee stock options? Although stock option plans offer many advantages, the tax implications for employees can be complicated. Dilution can be very costly to shareholder over the long run. The offering price, called the grant price, is typically the market price at the time the option is offered. The benefit is that the employee can exercise the option when he or she wants to within a set period of time. Say Company X gives or grants its employees options to buy shares of stock at $5 a share. The employees can exercise the options starting Aug. 1, On Aug. 1, , the stock is at $